Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2008; v. 68;1; p. 15-30; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2008.68.3
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Criss, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Abundance, Notation, and Fractionation of Light Stable Isotopes

Robert E. Criss

Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, U.S.A., criss{at}wustl.edu

James Farquhar

University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, U.S.A., jfarquha{at}essic.umd.edu

Stable isotopes have become an essential tool to characterize and understand terrestrial and extraterrestrial matter. This chapter will briefly review the abundances of important light stable isotopes, demonstrate the link between abundance and atomic weight, introduce the notations and diagrams that are commonly used to report isotopic measurements, describe and partially explain the types of fractionation effects known to occur in nature, and direct the reader to more comprehensive sources of information on each subject. The special techniques needed to make accurate isotopic measurements gave rise to special notation for reporting stable isotope data, and these notations in turn gave rise to special diagrams that emphasize compositional differences and facilitate interpretation. Fundamental definitions are the isotope ratio R, representing the ratio of the abundance of a heavy isotope to that of a lighter, typically much more common isotope, and the isotopic fractionation factor {alpha}, representing the quotient RA/RB of the isotope ratios of two substances A and B. Under equilibrium conditions, ln{alpha} can theoretically vary linearly with 1/T at low temperatures or with 1/T2 at high temperatures, forming the basis for a standard graph. For practical reasons the ratio R is difficult to measure and inconvenient to report, so stable isotope abundances are usually reported as delta values ({delta}-values) that describe their deviations from a defined "standard" material. Thus, the most important diagram for data interpretation is the "{delta}-{delta} plot" where the {delta}-values of two coexisting phases are simply plotted against each other. In systems where two different heavy isotopes exist, two different delta values may be defined, each normalizing the abundance of one of the heavy isotopes to the common light isotope. In such cases, a very important diagram called the "three isotope" plot involves simply plotting these two different {delta}-values against each other for a given material, and the slopes of data arrays on such graphs can be used to distinguish ordinary "mass-dependent" fractionation (MDF) effects from "non-mass-dependent" fractionations (NMF). Numerous algebraic convolutions of the above definitions have been made, providing special definitions that can elucidate different phenomena. The processes that govern isotope distribution have become progressively better understood, yet recent studies show that these processes are more diverse than anticipated only ten years ago.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
B. S. Meyer, L. R. Nittler, A. N. Nguyen, and S. Messenger
Nucleosynthesis and Chemical Evolution of Oxygen
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 68(1): 31 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
H. Yurimoto, A. N. Krot, B.-G. Choi, J. Aleon, T. Kunihiro, and A. J. Brearley
Oxygen Isotopes of Chondritic Components
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 68(1): 141 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
E. D. Young, K. Kuramoto, R. A. Marcus, H. Yurimoto, and S. B. Jacobsen
Mass-independent Oxygen Isotope Variation in the Solar Nebula
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 68(1): 187 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
T. H. Burbine, A. S. Rivkin, S. K. Noble, T. Mothe-Diniz, W. F. Bottke, T. J. McCoy, M. D. Dyar, and C. A. Thomas
Oxygen and Asteroids
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 68(1): 273 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
I. A. Franchi
Oxygen Isotopes in Asteroidal Materials
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 68(1): 345 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
R. E. Criss
Terrestrial Oxygen Isotope Variations and Their Implications for Planetary Lithospheres
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 68(1): 511 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America