Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2002; v. 49;1; p. 149-221; DOI: 10.2138/gsrmg.49.1.149
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenter, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

X-ray Reflectivity as a Probe of Mineral-Fluid Interfaces: A User Guide

Paul A. Fenter

Environmental Research Division, Argonne National Laboratory, ER-203, Argonne, Illinois, 60439-4843, U.S.A.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
The many tools with which one can probe the atomic-scale structures of surfaces include electron-, ion-, and X-ray based techniques (e.g., low energy electron diffraction, Rutherford ion backscattering, X-ray diffraction, photoelectron diffraction), as well as scanning probe microscopies (e.g., scanning tunneling microscopy and atomic force microscopy) (Somorjai 1981; Woodruff and Delchar 1986; Zangwill 1988; van Hove 1999). These tools have been extremely valuable for revealing surfaces structures and processes at ultra-high vacuum conditions. However, most of these surface-sensitive techniques suffer from the substantial shortcoming, from the perspective of mineral-fluid interface studies, that they cannot be applied to surfaces in contact with water. It is preferable to measure mineral-fluid interface structures in situ for direct insight into the geochemical phenomena of interest because there is no reason to assume that a mineral surface can be removed from an aqueous solution without substantially modifying the surface structure or properties.

X-rays are an ideal probe of mineral-water interfaces. X-rays readily penetrate macroscopic amounts of water and can therefore investigate the mineral-water interface directly, in situ. X-rays can measure atomic scale structures, such as the separation of individual atoms or molecules, because X-ray wavelengths are comparable to atomic sizes (Warren 1990). In fact, the interaction of X-rays with matter is known at a very fundamental level, and X-ray based techniques can provide truly quantitative data concerning the arrangements of atoms through a variety of approaches, such as crystallography and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (Als-Nielsen and McMorrow 2001). These characteristics can also be used to study the structure of the mineral-fluid interface (e.g., atomic locations, bond lengths) with sub-Ångstrom precision.

Of the many X-ray based techniques available, a very powerful approach for probing interfacial structures is based on the measurement of X-ray reflectivity. The X-ray reflectivity . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America