Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2002; v. 49;1; p. 221-266; DOI: 10.2138/gsrmg.49.1.221
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedzyk, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

X-ray Standing Wave Studies of Minerals and Mineral Surfaces: Principles and Applications

Michael J. Bedzyk1,2 and Likwan Cheng3

1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60208, U.S.A.
2 Materials Science Division
3 Environmental Research Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, 60439, U.S.A.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
With a penetration depth ranging from microns to millimeters, Ångstrom-wavelength X-rays are an ideal probe for studying atomic-scale buried structures found in the natural environment, such as impurities in minerals and adsorbed ions at mineral-water interfaces. But this penetration depth also makes an X-ray beam inherently less useful as a spatially localized probe. Using the superposition of two coherently coupled X-ray beams, however, makes it possible to localize the X-ray intensity into interference fringes of an X-ray standing wave (XSW) field, as illustrated in Figure 1Go, and thereby attain a spatially localized periodic probe with a length scale equivalent to the XSW period. The XSW period is


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (33K):



 
Figure 1. Top: A standing wave field formed from the superposition of two traveling plane waves of wavelength {lambda} and intersection angle (scattering angle) 2{theta}. The standing wave period is D as defined in Equation (1). Bottom: The two traveling planes waves are represented in reciprocal space by wave vectors K0 and KR. K0 = KR = 1/{lambda}. The standing wave is defined by standing-wave vector Q defined in Equation (2).

 

Formula 1(1)

where {lambda} is the X-ray wavelength and 2{theta} is the scattering angle or angle separation between the two coherently coupled wave vectors KR and K0. In reciprocal space, the scattering vector, or wave vector transfer, is defined as


Formula 2(2)

Q is in the direction perpendicular to the equal-intensity planes of the XSW and has a magnitude that is the reciprocal of D. Thus, Q is also referred to as the standing wave vector.

An X-ray standing wave can be used as an atom-specific probe via the photoelectric effect, which can be observed by photoelectron emission, fluorescence, or Auger electron emission. There are a number of mechanisms for generating an XSW. The simplest and perhaps most practical method for producing an XSW . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
D. R. Cole, K. W. Herwig, E. Mamontov, and J. Z. Larese
Neutron Scattering and Diffraction Studies of Fluids and Fluid-Solid Interactions
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 63(1): 313 - 362.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America