Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sutton, S. R. Articles by Eng, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Microfluorescence and Microtomography Analyses of Heterogeneous Earth and Environmental Materials

¹ Department of Geophysical Sciences and
² Consortium for Advanced Radiation Sources, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, U.S.A
³ Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, 29802, U.S.A.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
Analytical techniques with high sensitivity and high spatial resolution are crucial for understanding the chemical properties of complex earth materials and environmental samples, and these so-called "microprobes" have become workhorses of the geochemical community as well as important tools for environmental scientists. These microanalytical instruments are based on various forms of sample excitation and detection. They are complementary in terms of spatial resolution, element sensitivity, energy deposition and non-destructiveness.

Several techniques fall in the class of methods employing charged particle excitation of X-ray fluorescence, including electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) and particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE). EMPA is capable of µm-sized spots with minimum detection limits near 100 mg kg^–1. PIXE is well suited for analyses of relatively light elements with 10 mg kg^–1 sensitivity and µm-sized spots. The relatively large energy deposited by the charged particle beam can complicate the analysis of volatile elements or induce valence state changes of redox sensitive elements. Sensitivity of these technologies is a relatively smooth function of atomic number.

Other techniques are based on sample sputtering followed by mass spectrometry of the vaporized products, including secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Beam sizes are in the few to tens of µm range. Elemental sensitivities for SIMS are highly variable depending on ion yield, and quantification can be difficult because of matrix effects in the ion production process. SIMS and LA-ICP-MS have very high sensitivities for some elements and low sensitivity for others. These and other microanalytical techniques used in earth science research are described in Potts et al. (1995).

The subject of this chapter is synchrotron X-ray fluorescence (SXRF) microprobe analysis (Horowitz and Howell 1972) and microtomography. Unlike other microanalytical techniques, SXRF uses photons for excitation. Spot sizes are in the µm range . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Walker, M. B. Parsons, H. E. Jamieson, and A. Lanzirotti ARSENIC MINERALOGY OF NEAR-SURFACE TAILINGS AND SOILS: INFLUENCES ON ARSENIC MOBILITY AND BIOACCESSIBILITY IN THE NOVA SCOTIA GOLD MINING DISTRICTS Can Mineral, June 1, 2009; 47(3): 533 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. KOEPKE, G. FALKENBERG, K. RICKERS, and O. DIEDRICH Trace element diffusion and element partitioning between garnet and andesite melt using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microanalysis ({micro}-SRXRF) European Journal of Mineralogy, October 1, 2003; 15(5): 883 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]