Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2002; v. 51;1; p. 253-290; DOI: 10.2138/gsrmg.51.1.253
© 2002 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic Wave Attenuation: Energy Dissipation in Viscoelastic Crystalline Solids

Reid F. Cooper

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Seismic imaging as a tool to understand the structure and, perhaps, the dynamics of the planet at depth involves the spatially resolved, combined study of wave velocities and velocity dispersion, wave birefringence and wave attenuation (mechanical absorption). When integrated with insights from petrology, plus-or-minus input from magneto-tellurics, specific hypotheses concerning structure at depth can be formulated (cf. Karato 1993; Karato and Karki 2001). The recent advances in tomography have allowed significant improvements in spatial resolution which also have allowed ever more exacting hypotheses of structure to be articulated. Nevertheless, as is nicely illustrated by the relatively recent seismic analyses of an accreting plate margin (the East Pacific Rise —e.g., Toomey et al. 1998; Webb and Forsyth 1998), the structures inferred at depth can vary significantly: clearly, the interpretation of seismic data is limited specifically by a lack of understanding of the physical processes by which low-frequency wave absorption occurs, particularly in the cases (a) where melt is present and/or (b) where the material is being actively plastically deformed.

This chapter emphasizes the mineral physics/materials science of mechanical absorption, specifically in dense materials at elevated temperature; the interest, then, is in employing the physical study of mechanical absorption to understand natural phenomena such as those mentioned above. Beyond questions of the basic mineral physics of absorption, the guiding interest the community of scholars pursuing the ideas is in isolating actual absorption mechanisms operative in the geological setting thereby allowing for a greater discrimination in the interpretation of seismic data.

At the outset, I note that this contribution does not seek to be a comprehensive review of the ideas and work involved in the physics of mechanical absorption. There are marvelous reviews in the literature that are both authoritative and current; I refer to these frequently in contemplating . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
S.-i. Karato
Remote Sensing of Hydrogen in Earth's Mantle
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 343 - 375.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America