Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2005; v. 57;1; p. 105-143; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2005.57.4
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chukanov, N. V.
Right arrow Articles by Pekov, I. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Heterosilicates with Tetrahedral-Octahedral Frameworks: Mineralogical and Crystal-Chemical Aspects

Nikita V. Chukanov1

1 Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, 142432 Chernogolovka, Moscow Region, Russia, chukanov@icp.ac.ru

Igor V. Pekov2

2 Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University 119899 Moscow, Russia

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Steady progress in methods of synthesis and investigation of physical properties and crystal-chemical features of silicate microporous materials with transition elements (so-called zeolite-like amphoterosilicates) took place during the last decade. Materials of this type are promising ion exchangers, sorbents, catalysts or catalyst carriers and, accordingly, can be used in chromatography, catalysis, water purification, etc. Unlike common zeolites being aluminosilicates, frameworks of amphoterosilicates with transition metals are built of both tetrahedral fragments and "strong" cations (Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, Sn, W, Fe, Mn, Zn, etc., see Chukanov et al. 2004) with coordination numbers 6 or 5. Structural and chemical diversity of synthetic and natural amphoterosilicates is a basis for the wide variety of their properties. On the other hand, the number of different combinations of structure types and compositions of non-zeolite microporous minerals is still larger than the number of different synthetic materials of this type. In addition, whereas minerals are often available as crystals suitable for structural investigations, synthetic materials are often microcrystalline. Thus, natural titanosilicates, niobosilicates and zirconosilicates can be considered as prototypes of new materials with ion exchange, sorptional and catalytic properties (cf. Rocha and Lin 2005). The brightest examples are members of the eudialyte, labuntsovite, lovozerite, and hilairite groups, elpidite, zorite, gaidonnayite, penkvilksite. These minerals were formed in late formations related to alkaline massifs (alkaline pegmatites, hydrothermalites and metasomatites; cf. Pekov and Chukanov 2005).


    GENERAL CHARACTERIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF MICROPOROUS HETEROSILICATE MINERALS
 
Among about 4100 known mineral species, several hundreds minerals have open-framework structures but only about one hundred are classified as proper zeolites (Bish and Ming 2001) with frameworks consisting of atoms having only 4-fold coordination. In particular, a large number of zeolite-like microporous heterosilicate minerals (MHM) is known whose frameworks contain transition elements (mainly Ti, Nb and Zr, but also Fe, Mn, Zn, Ta, Sn, W) having 6-fold, . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
N. V. Zubkova, U. Kolitsch, I. V. Pekov, A. G. Turchkova, M. F. Vigasina, D. Yu. Pushcharovsky, and E. Tillmanns
Crystal chemistry of Rb-, Sr-, Ba-, Ca- and Pb-exchanged forms of natural hilairite
European Journal of Mineralogy, April 1, 2009; 21(2): 495 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
I. V. Pekov, N. V. Chukanov, N. A. Yamnova, A. E. Zadov, and P. Tarassoff
GJERDINGENITE-Na AND GJERDINGENITE-Ca, TWO NEW MINERAL SPECIES OF THE LABUNTSOVITE GROUP
Can Mineral, June 1, 2007; 45(3): 529 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
M. Cadoni and G. Ferraris
Microporous titanosilicates - Synthesis and structural characterization of a new orthorhombic-type labuntsovite
European Journal of Mineralogy, March 1, 2007; 19(2): 217 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
G. Ferraris and A. Gula
Polysomatic Aspects of Microporous Minerals - Heterophyllosilicates, Palysepioles and Rhodesite-Related Structures
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 69 - 104.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
I. V. Pekov and N. V. Chukanov
Microporous Framework Silicate Minerals with Rare and Transition Elements: Minerogenetic Aspects
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 145 - 171.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. Rocha and Z. Lin
Microporous Mixed Octahedral-Pentahedral-Tetrahedral Framework Silicates
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 173 - 201.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America