Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pasero, M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A Short Outline of the Tunnel Oxides

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy, pasero@dst.unipi.it

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
Within the large and comprehensive group of oxide minerals (class 4 in the Strunz classification; Strunz and Nickel 2001), the most relevant subgroup in the frame of microporous materials is that of the so-called "tunnel oxides." This rather generic term historically refers to a number of minerals which, from a chemical point of view, are (mainly) manganese oxides. In nature manganese occurs in three different oxidation states—Mn²⁺, Mn³⁺ and Mn⁴⁺—with the latter being the dominant form in tunnel oxides. Tetravalent manganese typically has octahedral coordination, and using only [Mn⁴⁺O₆] building modules linked together via corner- and edge-sharing it is feasible to construct many framework structures. Besides, a set of titanate minerals display the same feature, as might be expected due to the similar crystal-chemical behaviour of Mn⁴⁺ and Ti⁴⁺ cations. Therefore, this note is devoted to describing the structural principles and arrangements of minerals—and a number of synthetic compounds as well—in which the dominant cations are Mn⁴⁺ and Ti⁴⁺.

Starting from the basic formula of manganese dioxide, Mn⁴⁺O₂, incorporation of mono- and divalent cations (primarily alkali and alkali earths) within the tunnels of the structures, can be accommodated by partial reduction of manganese. Until recently, there was a considerable uncertainty and lively debate (e.g., Burns et al. 1983; Burns et al. 1985; Giovanoli 1985) concerning the valence of the reduced species and whether Mn²⁺ or Mn³⁺ was present. It is now commonly accepted on the basis of several high-quality structural studies that Mn³⁺ replaces Mn⁴⁺. In titaniferous phases, charge balance accompanying the inclusion of tunnel cations is not adjusted by reduction to Ti³⁺, but through incorporation of Fe³⁺, V³⁺ or Cr³⁺ substituting for Ti⁴⁺. The generic substitutions can be summarized in the generic formula:

where . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. V. Chukanov and I. V. Pekov Heterosilicates with Tetrahedral-Octahedral Frameworks: Mineralogical and Crystal-Chemical Aspects Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 105 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF]