Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2005; v. 57;1; p. 307-401; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2005.57.10
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, T.
Right arrow Articles by Madhavi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Apatite – An Adaptive Framework Structure

Tim White, Cristiano Ferraris, Jean Kim and Srinivasan Madhavi

School of Materials Science and Engineering Nanyang Technological University N 4.1-01-30, Nanyang Avenue Singapore 639798

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Apatite, the most common phosphate mineral, is generally described by the formula Ca5(PO4)3(OH,F,Cl) or, more completely with regard to its usual description in P63/m symmetry, by the unit cell content [Ca4][Ca6][(PO4)6][OH,F,Cl]2. An earlier volume of the Reviews series (Kohn et al. 2002) has dealt with the mineralogy and crystallography of apatite sensu stricto (Hughes and Rakovan 2002) and the diverse compounds that adopt apatite or apatite-like structures (Pan and Fleet 2002; Huminicki and Hawthorne 2002). In addition, apatite compilations have appeared at regular intervals (Wychoff 1965; McConnell 1973; Nriagu and Moore 1984; Brown and Constantz 1994; Elliott 1994) as the breadth of apatite chemistry has expanded and the level of understanding of its importance with respect to the mineral, materials, environmental, and biological sciences increased. It is not therefore, the purpose of this chapter to restate these excellent reviews, but rather, to focus on microporosity in apatites, a feature which allows ion conduction and exchange, and that is proving to be an important consideration for fashioning synthetic analogues of these minerals in technologically advantageous ways.

The notion of apatite as an industrially significant microporous mineral is not new. In 1944, V. M. Goldschmidt who had studied apatite deposits in Scandinavia and at that time had found refuge from war-ravaged Europe at the Macaulay Institute of Soil Research, Aberdeen (Kauffman 1997; McIntyre 2004) persuaded C. A. Beevers to undertake a new refinement of fluorapatite. The results collected in the seminal paper of Beevers and McIntyre (1946), lead not only to the most accurate crystallographic data available at that time, but also provided the first overview of [Ca4][Ca6][(PO4)6][F]2, noting that it . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
M. Nespolo and G. Ferraris
A survey of hybrid twins in non-silicate minerals
European Journal of Mineralogy, August 1, 2009; 21(4): 673 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
M. Mellini
Micro- and Mesoporous Carbon Forms, Chrysotile, and Clathrates
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 435 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America