Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2005; v. 57;1; p. 69-104; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2005.57.3
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferraris, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gula, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Polysomatic Aspects of Microporous Minerals – Heterophyllosilicates, Palysepioles and Rhodesite-Related Structures

Giovanni Ferraris1,2

1 Dipartimento di Scienze Mineralogiche e Petrologiche, Università di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy, giovanni.ferraris@unito.it

Angela Gula2

2 Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 10125 Torino, Italy, angela.gula@uito.it

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Several structural families reported in this book can be described by using concepts of modular crystallography (Thompson 1978; Veblen 1991; Merlino 1997; Ferraris et al. 2004). This chapter presents three groups of microporous minerals emphasizing the modular aspects of their crystal structures and the role that modularity plays in correlating different structures as well as structure and properties, namely aspects aimed at an engineering of microporous materials (cf. Rocha and Lin 2005).

The description of a crystal structure as an edifice consisting of complex building modules that occur also in other structures implicitly leads to identify features that are common to a group of compounds. This kind of group can often be expressed as a series of structures that are collinear in composition and cell parameters, information that may be crucial to model unknown structures related to the series, as illustrated by some examples in this chapter.

Biopyriboles (Fig. 1Go) represent a first and now classical example of modular structures established by Thompson (1978). He showed that the structures of micas, pyroxenes and amphiboles share, according to different ratios, the same modules of mica (M) and pyroxene (P) and are members of a polysomatic series MmPp. The ideal chemical composition and cell parameters of the members of the series are linear functions of the ratio m/p. The classification of biopyriboles as members of a polysomatic series, a type of series belonging to the wider category of the homologous series (cf. Ferraris et al. 2004), and the consequent discovery of the multiple-chain-width biopyriboles jimthompsonite and chesterite (Veblen and Buseck 1979) dramatically proved the predictive power of these series in terms of structure characterization and modeling. The modeling of carlosturanite (Mellini . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
M. Cadoni and G. Ferraris
Two new members of the rhodesite mero-plesiotype series close to delhayelite and hydrodelhayelite: synthesis and crystal structure
European Journal of Mineralogy, April 1, 2009; 21(2): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
M. Cadoni and G. Ferraris
Microporous titanosilicates - Synthesis and structural characterization of a new orthorhombic-type labuntsovite
European Journal of Mineralogy, March 1, 2007; 19(2): 217 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
P. Nemeth, G. Ferraris, G. Radnoczi, and O. A. Ageeva
TEM AND X-RAY STUDY OF SYNTACTIC INTERGROWTHS OF EPISTOLITE, MURMANITE AND SHKATULKALITE
Can Mineral, June 1, 2005; 43(3): 973 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
N. V. Chukanov and I. V. Pekov
Heterosilicates with Tetrahedral-Octahedral Frameworks: Mineralogical and Crystal-Chemical Aspects
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 105 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
I. V. Pekov and N. V. Chukanov
Microporous Framework Silicate Minerals with Rare and Transition Elements: Minerogenetic Aspects
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 145 - 171.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. Rocha and Z. Lin
Microporous Mixed Octahedral-Pentahedral-Tetrahedral Framework Silicates
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 173 - 201.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
M. Mellini
Micro- and Mesoporous Carbon Forms, Chrysotile, and Clathrates
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 57(1): 435 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America