Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2005; v. 58;1; p. 499-525; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2005.58.19
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thermochronometers in Sedimentary Basins

Phillip A. Armstrong

Dept. of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, 800 N. State College Blvd. Fullerton, CA 92831, parmstrong@fullerton.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Sedimentary basins, both modern and ancient, cover most of Earth’s land and subsea surface, and provide some of the best natural laboratories for studying and constraining geologic processes. The record of sedimentation, burial, erosion, and uplift provides a rich history that can be combined with various analytical and modeling techniques to evaluate: (1) processes that lead to basin formation; (2) deformation of regions related to plate tectonic effects; (3) timing and duration of hydrocarbon generation, migration, and trapping; (4) past and present effects of fluid flow in basin deposits; and (5) past climate change. Sedimentary basins have been classified by many workers (e.g., Bally and Snelson 1980; Dickinson 1993; Ingersoll and Busby 1995). Ingersoll and Busby (1995) generally classify the basins as forming in divergent settings, intraplate regions, convergent settings, transform settings, and hybrid settings. Many mechanisms have been proposed for the formation of the different styles of basins including, but not limited to, crustal thinning, sedimentary and tectonic loading, subcrustal loading, and mantle lithospheric thickening (e.g., Ingersoll and Busby 1995).

Thermochronometers have played an increasingly important role in the evaluation of both intra- and interbasin processes. Thermochronometers, especially the lower-temperature apatite fission-track and apatite (U-Th)/He dating, are now commonly combined with burial and thermal history analysis and modeling to provide important constraints on the timing and duration of heating/cooling events that can be used to evaluate hydrocarbon systems as well as structural and basin-forming mechanisms.

Past reviews of thermochronometer use in sedimentary basins are given by Naeser et al. (1989), Green et al. (1989a), Naeser (1993), and Giles and Indrelid (1998). Rather than review each study of thermochronometer use in sedimentary basins during the last decade, in this chapter some of the fundamental concepts used to evaluate the present-day thermal field . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
T. J. Dunai
Forward Modeling and Interpretation of (U-Th)/He Ages
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 58(1): 259 - 274.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America