|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dept. of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, 800 N. State College Blvd. Fullerton, CA 92831, parmstrong@fullerton.edu
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
Thermochronometers have played an increasingly important role in the evaluation of both intra- and interbasin processes. Thermochronometers, especially the lower-temperature apatite fission-track and apatite (U-Th)/He dating, are now commonly combined with burial and thermal history analysis and modeling to provide important constraints on the timing and duration of heating/cooling events that can be used to evaluate hydrocarbon systems as well as structural and basin-forming mechanisms.
Past reviews of thermochronometer use in sedimentary basins are given by Naeser et al. (1989), Green et al. (1989a), Naeser (1993), and Giles and Indrelid (1998). Rather than review each study of thermochronometer use in sedimentary basins during the last decade, in this chapter some of the fundamental concepts used to evaluate the present-day thermal field
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Dunai Forward Modeling and Interpretation of (U-Th)/He Ages Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 58(1): 259 - 274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |