Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2005; v. 59;1; p. 1-7; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2005.59.1
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banfield, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Search for a Molecular-Level Understanding of the Processes that Underpin the Earth’s Biogeochemical Cycles

Jillian F. Banfield, Gene W. Tyson, Eric E. Allen and Rachel J. Whitaker

Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Department of Environmental Science Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley Berkeley California, 94720-4767, U.S.A., jill@eps.berkeley.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    CHARACTERIZING BIOGEOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS
 
Evidence of connections between microbial activity and the Earth’s biogeochemical cycles is all around us, and motivates our interest in the mechanisms of microbial transformations, their rates, and the distribution of microbial activities across environment types and over Earth history. In general, the approach to investigating a geomicrobiological process begins with biological and geochemical characterization of the environment of interest. Geochemical characteristics constrain available metabolisms (e.g., McCollom and Shock 1997) and patterns can reveal processes not recognized initially to be microbially mediated.

The membership of microbial communities can be assayed through cultivation and cultivation-independent methods. However, this task is not without its challenges. There is little consensus about the ways in which organisms should be grouped into relevant ecological units such as species (Gevers et al. 2005). Even using standard classification techniques, the extent of microbial diversity appears vast, and recent analyses suggest that current estimates may tremendously under predict the amount of genetic diversity in the biosphere. In addition, a single organism type may contain far more genes than expected based on genomic sequencing of an isolate of that species because species populations can exhibit internal heterogeneity. Thus, it seems that comprehensive characterization of the microbial membership of an environment over space and time is a problem of almost incomprehensible magnitude. Furthermore, microbial census taking is only the first step. Beyond documenting the assemblage of organisms present, we need to know how they are distributed, what are they doing, how they are doing it, and the ways that their activities impact the physical and chemical characteristics of their surroundings.

In the near future, the only systems in which it will be plausible to tackle the level of characterization required for relatively comprehensive analyses are the simplest ones. For example, in samples of relatively low geochemical and . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America