Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilbert, P. U. P. A. Articles by Frazer, B. H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The Organic-Mineral Interface in Biominerals

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Center, 3731, Schneider Drive, Stoughton, Wisconsin, 53589, U.S.A., pupa@src.wisc.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	BIOMINERALS: TOUGH STRUCTURES OF LIFE

 
Introduction to biominerals
Numerous living organisms form minerals. These biogenic minerals, or biominerals, are composite materials containing an organic matrix and nano- or micro-scale amorphous or crystalline minerals. In this chapter we will review the molecular aspects of biomineralization and describe as completely as is currently possible the organic-mineral interface, the location in which organic-mineral interactions occur. Biomineral composite materials include bone, dentine, enamel, statoliths, otoliths, mollusk and crustacean shells, coccolith scales, eggshells, sponge silica skeletons, algal, radiolarian and diatom silica micro-shells, and a variety of transition metal minerals produced by different bacteria (Lowenstam and Weiner 1989; Addadi and Weiner 1997; Banfield and Nealson 1997; Fortin et al. 1997; Fitts et al. 1999; Templeton et al. 1999; Lower et al. 2001a; Mann 2001; Glasauer et al. 2002; De Yoreo and Vekilov 2003; Weiner and Dove 2003; De Yoreo and Dove 2004).

From a materials science perspective, organic molecules are soft, compliant and fracture resistant while inorganic crystals are hard and brittle. Biomineral composites combine the best of these properties and minimize the weaknesses: they are both hard and fracture resistant (tough) (Currey 1977; Jackson et al. 1988; Schäffer et al. 1997; Kamat et al. 2000; Gao et al 2003). This is due to several factors: structure, nano-size and chemical composition. Only recently materials scientists have begun to learn how to build a synthetic composite material that outperforms each component taken separately, and have done so inspired by shell nacre (Tang et al. 2003).

The mechanisms of biomineral formation are not fully understood (Mount et al. 2004) and while they are of interest in their own right, they may also provide models for new materials concepts, inspire design solutions and give new . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Politi, R. A. Metzler, M. Abrecht, B. Gilbert, F. H. Wilt, I. Sagi, L. Addadi, S. Weiner, and P. U. P. A. Gilbert Transformation mechanism of amorphous calcium carbonate into calcite in the sea urchin larval spicule PNAS, November 11, 2008; 105(45): 17362 - 17366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Posfai and R. E. Dunin-Borkowski Sulfides in Biosystems Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 679 - 714. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Banfield, G. W. Tyson, E. E. Allen, and R. J. Whitaker The Search for a Molecular-Level Understanding of the Processes that Underpin the Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 59(1): 1 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Whitaker and J. F. Banfield Population Dynamics Through the Lens of Extreme Environments Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 59(1): 259 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF]