Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, S. R. Articles by MacPherson, G. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Earth-Moon System, Planetary Science, and Lessons Learned

Department of Geology The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia e-mail: Ross.Taylor@anu.edu.au

Carle M. Pieters

Department of Geological Sciences Brown University Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, U.S.A.

Glenn J. MacPherson

Department of Mineral Sciences, MRC-119 National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution P.O. Box 37012 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.A.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	1. INTRODUCTION

 
The origin and evolution of the Moon is now well understood. Many bizarre theories were proposed to account for our satellite before these were swept away by the data from the Apollo missions. We now understand with the benefit of hindsight that we are looking at a very ancient object whose surface has changed little for the past 3.5 b.y.

Nevertheless the Moon remains a unique body in the solar system. The Moon formed as the result of a glancing collision with the Earth of a Mars-sized impactor late in the accretional history of the Earth when both bodies had differentiated into metallic cores and silicate mantles. The impactor is derived from the neighborhood of the Earth, as shown by similarities in O and Cr isotopes. Our satellite is mostly derived from the mantle of the impactor rather than from the mantle of the Earth. The Moon melted, perhaps entirely and a thick (50 km?) feldspathic crust, dated at 4460 ± 40 Ma floated on the ocean of magma. The closest analogue may be the crust of Mercury. The interior crystallized into cumulate zones of differing mineralogy from which the mare basalts were later derived by partial melting.

The impact history of the lunar surface has provided insights into planetary accretion, the planetesimal hypothesis and the bombardment history in the inner solar system. Debate continues whether the concentration of impact-produced basins constitutes a "cataclysm" or the tail end of accretion. A notable example and a target for future missions is the 2500 km diameter South Pole-Aitken basin that may provide insights into the nature of the deep lunar crust.

Remaining significant problems include whether the Moon has a small metallic core, while the deep interior structure is not well understood. New seismic and heat flow data are an urgent priority. . . . [Full Text of this Article]