|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.
2 Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
3 University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, U.S.A.
4 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, U.S.A.
5 Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
6 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
7 University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.
8 Boston University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
9 Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.
10 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A.
11 Northrop Grumman, Van Nuys, California, U.S.A.
12 Centre dEtude Spatiale des Rayonnements, Toulouse, France
Correspondence: Corresponding authors e-mail: Paul Lucey <lucey@higp.hawaii.edu> Randy Korotev <korotev@wustl.edu>
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
| 1. INTRODUCTION |
|---|
The data obtained remotely by the Galileo, Clementine, and Lunar Prospector missions, as well as data derived from lunar meteorites, have resulted in major changes to our understanding of global distributions of chemistry and rocks. This chapter summarizes the current understanding of this critical interface, the surface of the Moon, in its role as the lower boundary of the lunar atmosphere, the upper boundary of the crust, and the window through which we view, through remote sensing, the composition of the crust and the history of the Moon. In this post-Lunar Prospector time, the view of the Moon has changed, lending new perspectives to lunar samples and lunar processes. But the New View will likely remain in flux as we continue to digest the results from these recent space missions and move forward to a new era of lunar exploration.
Despite the freshness of our perspective, this is an important moment to capture,
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |