Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2006; v. 60;1; p. v-xv; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2006.60.0
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jolliff, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

PREFACE

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Unlike the Moon, this volume only took a little more than 4 years in the making, but like the Moon, it has gone through numerous changes. However, through it all, the editors of this volume have expertly coordinated the numerous authors and extensive subject matter into a comprehensive review in which the reader is now easily re-introduced to a "forgotten friend," the Moon. Their hard work and unwaivering dedication has made this volume a reality! My thanks goes out to them!

Supplemental material and errata (if any) can be found at the MSA website www.minsocam.org.

Jodi J. Rosso, Series Editor

West Richland, Washington

May 2006

The onset of the 21st century is proving to be an exciting time for planetary exploration. A high level of activity associated with the exploration of Mars and a resurgence of activity associated with the anticipated return to the Moon have captured the imagination of much of the planetary science community and the public, alike. The present level of involvement and enthusiasm for studies of the Moon are high, perhaps as high as they have been since shortly after the end of the U.S. Apollo and Soviet Luna programs. The very successful orbital missions of the 1990s, Clementine and Lunar Prospector, have provided key mineralogical, geochemical, and geophysical data sets that will take many years to fully process and digest. These new data sets must be integrated carefully with information gained from three preceding decades of study of lunar samples and older, less complete, remotely sensed data sets. Although there have been no new lunar sample-return missions since Apollo and Luna, new samples are available in the form of meteorites, recognized to be pieces of the Moon delivered to Earth by impact and gravitational forces. These, too, play a role in improved . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Bradley L. Jolliff

Washington University







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America