Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2006; v. 61;1; p. 633-677; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2006.61.12
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seal, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Sulfur Isotope Geochemistry of Sulfide Minerals

Robert R. Seal, II

U.S. Geological Survey 954 National Center Reston, Virginia, 20192, U.S.A., e-mail: rseal@usgs.gov

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Sulfur, the 10th most abundant element in the universe and the 14th most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, is the defining element of sulfide minerals and provides insights into the origins of these minerals through its stable isotopes. The insights come from variations in the isotopic composition of sulfide minerals and related compounds such as sulfate minerals or aqueous sulfur species, caused by preferential partitioning of isotopes among sulfur-bearing phases, known as fractionation. These variations arise from differences in temperature, or more importantly, oxidation and reduction reactions acting upon the sulfur. The oxidation and reduction reactions can occur at high temperature, such as in igneous systems, at intermediate temperatures, such as in hydrothermal systems, and at low temperature during sedimentary diagenesis. At high temperatures, the reactions tend to occur under equilibrium conditions, whereas at low temperatures, disequilibrium is prevalent. In addition, upper atmospheric processes also lead to isotopic fractionations that locally appear in the geologic record.

Sulfur isotope geochemistry as a subdiscipline of the geological sciences began in the late 1940s and early 1950s with early publications by Thode et al. (1949) and Szabo et al. (1950) on natural variations of sulfur isotopes, and Macnamara and Thode (1950) on the isotopic composition of terrestrial and meteoritic sulfur. Sakai (1957) presented an early scientific summary of sulfur isotope geochemistry, with a particular emphasis on high-temperature processes. Thode et al. (1961) also presented an early summary, but with an emphasis on low-temperature processes. Both of these summaries outlined salient aspects of the global sulfur cycle. Sulfur isotope geochemistry understandably has had a long history of application to the study of sulfide-bearing mineral deposits. Early noteworthy papers include those by Kulp et al. (1956) and Jensen (1957, 1959). Similarly, there is also a legacy of contributions to understanding sedimentary diagenesis . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
Z. Chang, R. R. Large, and V. Maslennikov
Sulfur isotopes in sediment-hosted orogenic gold deposits: Evidence for an early timing and a seawater sulfur source
Geology, December 1, 2008; 36(12): 971 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America