Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2006; v. 62;1; p. 1-28; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2006.62.1
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossman, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Analytical Methods for Measuring Water in Nominally Anhydrous Minerals

George R. Rossman

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125-2500, U.S.A., e-mail: grr@gps.caltech.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Decades of work have shown that trace- to minor-amounts of hydrous components commonly occur in minerals whose chemical formula would be normally written without any hydrogen, namely, the nominally anhydrous minerals (NAMs). When the concentrations of the hydrous components are several tenths of a percent by weight or higher, a variety of analytical methods such as weight loss on heating, X-ray cell parameters, X-ray structure refinement, Karl-Fischer titrations, or even careful electron microprobe analyses can be used to establish their concentrations (e.g., Aines and Rossman 1991). However, for most NAMs, accurate determinations with these common analytical methods prove difficult if not impossible. For this reason, infrared (IR) spectroscopy has become, and remains, the most widely used method to detect and analyze hydrous components (OH or H2O) in minerals and glasses because it is both highly sensitive and can be done rapidly with a commonly available, modestly priced instrument and at dimensions of just a few tens of micrometers. A change in the electric dipole occurs when the OH bond in either water and hydroxyl ions vibrate. This motion has a resonance coupling with electromagnetic radiation generally in the 3500 cm–1 region of the infrared spectrum. In addition, bending motions of the water molecule, and overtones and combination of these motions produce absorption in the infrared.

Under favorable conditions, namely a sharp band in a single orientation, just a few nanometers equivalent thickness of a hydroxyl species such as an amphibole can be detected in an otherwise anhydrous mineral such a pyroxene (Skogby et al. 1990). Routinely, detection limits of a few to tens of ppm wt of H2O in a mineral can be detected and often quantitatively determined. The overtone and combination modes of OH and H2O behave in predictable fashion in minerals (Rossman . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
E. Libowitzky and A. Beran
The Structure of Hydrous Species in Nominally Anhydrous Minerals: Information from Polarized IR Spectroscopy
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 29 - 52.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
K. Wright
Atomistic Models of OH Defects in Nominally Anhydrous Minerals
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 67 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
E. A. Johnson
Water in Nominally Anhydrous Crustal Minerals: Speciation, Concentration, and Geologic Significance
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 117 - 154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
H. Skogby
Water in Natural Mantle Minerals I: Pyroxenes
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 155 - 167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
A. Beran and E. Libowitzky
Water in Natural Mantle Minerals II: Olivine, Garnet and Accessory Minerals
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 169 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. Ingrin and M. Blanchard
Diffusion of Hydrogen in Minerals
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 291 - 320.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America