Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2006; v. 62;1; p. 321-342; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2006.62.14
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsen, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Effect of Water on the Equation of State of Nominally Anhydrous Minerals

Steven D. Jacobsen

Department of Geological Sciences Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois, 60208, U.S.A., e-mail: steven@earth.northwestern.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
It is possible that the majority of Earth’s H2O budget is present as hydroxyl (OH) structurally incorporated into the major nominally anhydrous minerals (NAMs) of the mantle (e.g., Martin and Donnay 1972). Ringwood (1966) thought as much as five times the surface H2O-mass could be present in the mantle, amounting to ~0.2 wt% H2O if distributed throughout the entire mantle (Harris and Middlemost 1969). We know now the (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 polymorphs of the upper mantle and transition zone can incorporate up to several weight percent of water in their structures (e.g., Smyth 1987; Inoue et al. 1995; Kohlstedt et al. 1996; Bolfan-Casanvoa et al. 2000; Mosenfelder et al. 2006). The possibility of a deep-Earth water cycle leads naturally to the question, is "water" in the mantle, whether regional or globally distributed, detectible seismically?

In order to address this question, it is necessary to know, quantitatively, the effects of water (or more precisely structurally bound hydroxyl) on the elastic moduli of mantle minerals. Also required are pressure and temperature derivatives of the elastic moduli for more direct comparison with seismological observation. This chapter will review what is known about the elastic properties of "hydroxylated" NAMs from experimental studies. From a crystal chemical perspective, hydrated NAMs are defect structures because hydrogen is usually incorporated through charge balance by cation vacancies. Therefore, small variations in water content can have a dramatic effect on thermoelastic parameters, more so than any other major geochemical substitution such as iron or aluminum. For example, at one atmosphere the addition of ~1 wt% H2O into ringwoodite has a similar effect on the shear modulus as raising the temperature by 800–1000 °C (Wang et al. 2003a; Jacobsen et al. 2004). However, due to elevated pressure . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
E. Libowitzky and A. Beran
The Structure of Hydrous Species in Nominally Anhydrous Minerals: Information from Polarized IR Spectroscopy
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 29 - 52.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. R. Smyth
Hydrogen in High Pressure Silicate and Oxide Mineral Structures
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2006; 62(1): 85 - 115.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America