Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2006; v. 62;1; p. 343-375; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2006.62.15
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karato, S.-i.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Remote Sensing of Hydrogen in Earth’s Mantle

Shun-ichiro Karato

Department of Geology and Geophysics Yale University New Haven, Connecticut, 06520-8109, U.S.A., e-mail: shun-ichiro.karato@yale.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Hydrogen1 in Earth’s interior is known to play a key role in a number of processes. Consequently, inferring the distribution of hydrogen is a critical step in our study of dynamics and evolution of Earth. Usually, hydrogen distribution is inferred from two types of samples at the surface. First, a magma may contain hydrogen (water), and under some conditions the water content of the magma can be quenched upon cooling. In these cases, measurements of the water content of the magma provide us with some constraints on the hydrogen (water) content of the source region (if we know the partitioning of hydrogen between magmas and the source rocks, and the degree of melting). Second, hydrogen content of some xenoliths transported by magma can be measured. They provide a direct clue as to the hydrogen content in a region from which a xenolith has been carried. However, these direct, petrologic approaches have two major problems. Firstly, the sampling is limited by the distribution of volcanoes, and even if there are volcanoes that carry rocks from Earth’s interior, the depth extent that volcanoes sample rocks is limited (usually <200 km). Secondly, there is no guarantee that the hydrogen content that one measures on these samples actually represents the hydrogen content in a region where these samples came from. For example, hydrogen is known to diffuse very easily so hydrogen dissolved in minerals could diffuse out during the transport of a rock, or conversely, a piece of rock may acquire extra hydrogen during its ascent. Also hydrogen atoms dissolved in minerals may precipitate in the mineral to form fluid inclusions or micro-scale hydrous minerals. In summary, the direct method to infer the distribution of hydrogen from rock samples has major limitations, and an alternative approach, i.e., remote sensing hydrogen content from geophysical observations . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America