Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2006; v. 63;1; p. v-x
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wenk, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

PREFACE

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

For over half a century neutron scattering has added valuable information about the structure of materials and many experiments have been performed. Contrary to X-rays that have quickly become a standard laboratory technique and are available to all modern researchers in physics, chemistry, materials and earth sciences, neutrons have been elusive and reserved for specialists. A primary reason is that neutron beams, at least so far, are only produced at large dedicated facilities with nuclear reactors and accelerators and access to those has been limited. Yet there are a substantial number of experiments that use neutron scattering as the following summary from some large facilities documents:


Approved User Proposals
Facility 1995 2005

ILL 697 696
ISIS 633 581
IPNS 92 138
Lujan 136 306

These numbers are lower than for synchrotron facilities such as ESRF (781 for 2005) and APS (1083 for 2005) but not by a large amount. This is rather surprising since neutron scattering is so much weaker than X-ray scattering and experiments take much longer. Clearly, Europe has been dominating in neutron research with three times as many experiments than in the U.S., at only the two largest facilities. But usage has stabilized, whereas in the U.S. there has been a steady increase over the last decade and new users come increasingly from fields such as materials and earth sciences. With the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Rudy Wenk

Dept. Earth and Planetary Science University of California at Berkeley, September 2006







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America