Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; October 2007; v. 67;1; p. 125-171; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2007.67.4
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oberti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cámara, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Long-Range Order in Amphiboles

Roberta Oberti1, Frank C. Hawthorne2, Elio Cannillo1 and Fernando Cámara1

1 Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche I-27100 Pavia, Italy, oberti@crystal.unipv.it, cannillo@crystal.unipv.it, camara@crystal.unipv.it
2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada, frank_hawthorne@umanitoba.ca

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Comprehensive knowledge of the order-disorder relations in amphiboles is essential to (1) complete understanding of the crystal chemistry of these minerals, and to (2) the use of amphiboles in thermodynamic calculations (e.g., of temperature and pressure of equilibration) where accurate activity models are critical to the accuracy of such treatments. Moreover, such information is essential to our understanding of phase relations, optical and electrical properties and dehydrogenation mechanisms. As a result, more effort has been expended on characterizing site occupancies in amphiboles than in any other group of minerals. Hawthorne (1983a,b) reviewed in detail all work prior to 1983. Here, we will briefly summarize this work, and focus more on what has been learned since then.


    METHODS OF DERIVING SITE POPULATIONS
 
We will briefly review the common methods of deriving site populations. It is important that everyone who uses site populations has an appreciation of the methods used to derive this information, as a significant fraction of the data in the literature is wrong, and the user has to be in a position to assess the accuracy and precision of the data that they will use. The most comprehensive method of deriving site populations is crystal-Structure REFinement (SREF), as this method senses every atom (in significant amounts) in a crystal. However, this universality has a negative side. Some atomic species cannot be distinguished as they scatter radiation in a very similar way. Different types of radiation (e.g., X-rays, neutrons) can compensate for this drawback: for example, X-ray scattering cannot easily distinguish between Fe and Mn or Fe and Ti (differences in size of these species can be used for this purpose, but this becomes inaccurate to ineffective in more complicated compositions), whereas neutron scattering can distinguish these species. However, there are many instances where such differentiation is not possible. It is here . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
J. Adam, R. Oberti, F. Camara, and T. H. Green
An electron microprobe, LAM-ICP-MS and single-crystal X-ray structure refinement study of the effects of pressure, melt-H2O concentration and fO2 on experimentally produced basaltic amphiboles
European Journal of Mineralogy, October 1, 2007; 19(5): 641 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America