Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; October 2007; v. 67;1; p. 287-322; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2007.67.8
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maresch, W. V.
Right arrow Articles by Czank, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Significance of the Reaction Path in Synthesizing Single-Phase Amphibole of Defined Composition

Walter V. Maresch

Institute of Geology, Mineralogy and Geophysics, Ruhr-University Bochum D 44780 Bochum, Germany, walter.maresch@rub.de

Michael Czank

Institute of Geosciences, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel D 24098 Kiel, Germany, czank@min.uni-kiel.de

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Amphiboles are common and very complex rock-forming minerals. Knowledge of their physical, chemical and thermodynamic properties allows us to understand rock-forming and geodynamic processes. Amphiboles also possess distinctive physical properties that make them potentially attractive in applied fields. Certainly, millions of dollars, rubles, etc. were spent 30–40 years ago to optimize techniques of amphibole synthesis, and, ironically, comparable sums have been or are still being spent to remediate asbestos danger.

In short, for whatever purpose, be it basic research or applied mineralogy, the task of synthesizing amphiboles of defined composition and crystal-chemical nature has been a challenge for a very long time. However, even a cursory review of the literature on amphiboles converges on one, often recognized and much discussed dilemma (e.g., Hawthorne 1983b, 1995; Maresch and Czank 1983b; Graham et al. 1989; Raudsepp et al. 1991). Compositions of amphibole products most often depart from the nominal experimental target. Is it then possible to synthesize single-phase amphibole products, and, if not, why not?

Ideally, synthesizing single-phase hydroxyl-amphibole from a given bulk composition would be the most accurate way to proceed to a well characterized amphibole product. Simply in terms of chemical composition, a bulk starting material can be prepared with greater accuracy than a multi-grain product can be characterized analytically. What goes in must come out! However, reality is more sobering. Various states of disorder are possible at constant bulk composition (e.g., Oberti et al. 2007; Hawthorne and Della Ventura 2007). Above all, the necessity to introduce H2O as a fluid, both as an intrinsic component of the structure and as a means of transmitting pressure in the experiment, introduces new and difficult to control degrees of freedom. Changes in valence states become possible. The target stoichiometry of the amphibole may be . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America