Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cipriani, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Amphiboles: Historical Perspective

Museo di Storia Naturale, sez. Mineralogia, Università di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, 50121 Firenze, Italia, curzio.cipriani@unifi.it

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

	INTRODUCTION

 
For centuries, asbestos and jade were the only known representatives of the group of minerals called amphiboles. In the XVIII century, rock minerals with naturalistic descriptions and little more than semiquantitative chemical analyses were also considered, while the XIX century saw an enormous number of goniometric determinations and chemical analyses to try to classify the many species that were gradually being discovered. Chemical analyses that were precise and without preconceptions were developed in the early XX century, but it was mainly X-ray diffraction that helped to clarify the nature of this group of minerals. The present discussion of the evolution of knowledge about the amphiboles stops at the second world war. In the second half of the XX century, there has been great technical progress in mineralogical research, especially in the field of spectroscopy. This has led to detailed crystallochemical knowledge of the amphiboles, which has also allowed their use for the solution of petrological problems.

German miners of the early XVIII century gave the name Hornblende, i.e., "dazzling horn," to a mineral that had a toughness similar to that of horse hooves and did not contain useful metals. A century later, Réné J. Haüy decided to give it a different name, Amphibole, i.e., ambiguous, because it often had a similar appearance but a different composition. Today, we know that amphiboles are a complex group of rock-forming minerals with numerous lattice sites that can host many different constituents; indeed, it has jokingly been defined as a "waste basket."

It is hoped that this note will give the reader an idea of how hard the road has been for researchers on amphiboles. It started with the simple description of the external appearance of these materials and has led today, at the beginning of the third millennium, to the acquisition . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Oberti, F. C. Hawthorne, E. Cannillo, and F. Camara Long-Range Order in Amphiboles Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, October 1, 2007; 67(1): 125 - 171. [Full Text] [PDF]