Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2009; v. 70;1; p. 125-180; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2009.70.4
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulik, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thermodynamic Concepts in Modeling Sorption at the Mineral-Water Interface

Dmitrii A. Kulik

Laboratory for Waste Management, Nuclear Energy and Safety Research Department, Paul Scherrer Institute CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland dmitrii.kulik@psi.ch

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Sorption phenomena on mineral-water interfaces (MWI) are known to control the retention of many trace elements and organic substances of environmental concern, as well as the kinetics of mineral dissolution/precipitation (Sposito 1984; Davis and Kent 1990; Dzombak and Morel 1990; Goldberg 1992; Stumm 1992; Morel and Hering 1993; Langmuir 1997; Zachara and Westall 1999; Benjamin 2002b; Ganor et al. 2009; and references therein). However, there is still no agreement about a uniform thermodynamic concept which can account for the relevant physicochemical interactions at MWI and can be implemented in popular geochemical modeling codes. This is a major obstacle for compiling a unified (ad)sorption thermodynamic database, also marred by disagreements in defining standard and reference states for (ad)sorbed species. In turn, confusion stems from the multiplicity of thermodynamic concepts used in the description of sorption phenomena on MWIs. The goal of this contribution is to summarize these concepts in a hope to illuminate ways along which they can eventually be made mutually consistent.


    ADSORPTION AND SORPTION
 
A minor element (M) can be retained on mineral-water interfaces by a number of sorption mechanisms which also depend on time. On a kinetic basis, this can be summarized in the so-called sorption continuum. At short reaction times, aqueous complexation competes for M with ion exchange on permanently-charged surfaces (such as basal planes or interlayer of clay minerals), as well as the outer-sphere surface complexation on (hydr)oxides. These fast processes are (almost) reversible. At longer reaction times, specific (multi-site) adsorption on clay particle edges or (hydr)oxides takes place; this kind of binding into inner-sphere surface species often displays an energetic heterogeneity at low total M concentrations in the system and becomes progressively irreversible with time. At still longer reaction times, the incorporation of (ad)sorbed . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
D. M. Sherman
Surface Complexation Modeling: Mineral Fluid Equilbria at the Molecular Scale
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2009; 70(1): 181 - 205.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. Schott, O. S. Pokrovsky, and E. H. Oelkers
The Link Between Mineral Dissolution/Precipitation Kinetics and Solution Chemistry
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2009; 70(1): 207 - 258.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
C. Zhu
Geochemical Modeling of Reaction Paths and Geochemical Reaction Networks
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2009; 70(1): 533 - 569.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America