Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry; January 2009; v. 70;1; p. 87-124; DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2009.70.3
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putnis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mineral Replacement Reactions

Andrew Putnis

Institut für Mineralogie, University of Münster, Münster, 48149 Germany, putnis@uni-muenster.de

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Whenever a mineral or mineral assemblage comes into contact with a fluid with which it is out of equilibrium, reequilibration will tend to take place to reduce the free energy of the whole system (i.e., of the solid + fluid). Such fluid-solid interactions span a very wide range of possible reactions, and are responsible for most of the mineral assemblages we see in the Earth’s crust. However, before discussing mineral replacement reactions, we will put them into the broader context of fluid-solid interactions by considering some examples of such reequilibration.

In the simplest case, we could consider the situation where a mineral, thermodynamically stable under some speciflc temperature and pressure conditions, comes into contact with pure water, such as quartz within its stability field (e.g., at T = 100 °C and 1 atmosphere pressure). Clearly, quartz will tend to dissolve until, at equilibrium, the aqueous silica solution, which at neutral pH is H4SiO4(aq), becomes saturated with respect to quartz. The reaction for this equilibration can be written:


Formula 1(1)

The equilibrium solubility constant for reaction (1) is given by


Formula 1

where a(i)aq stands for the activity of the parenthetical aqueous species. For the case of pure quartz and pure water where the activity is 1, Ksp ( qtz ) ~1.2 x 10–3 at 100 °C and 1 atmosphere pressure. However, if under these conditions the solid silica phase in contact with pure water was cristobalite (the high temperature polymorph of SiO2), the resulting aqueous solution, saturated with respect to cristobalite, would be supersaturated with respect to quartz, since the less stable phase is more soluble. The value of Ksp for cristobalite at 100 °C and 1 atmosphere pressure is ~5.1 x 10–3. Thus the thermodynamics would indicate that quartz should precipitate from such a solution. On . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America